<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>WTA News &#187; Filing</title>
	<atom:link href="http://w-t-a.org/news/category/filing/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://w-t-a.org/news</link>
	<description>Western Telecommunications Alliance - News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 May 2012 20:18:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Rural Associations File Comments on Level 3 Call Signaling Waiver Petition</title>
		<link>http://w-t-a.org/news/2012/05/21/rural-associations-file-comments-on-level-3-call-signaling-waiver-petitions/</link>
		<comments>http://w-t-a.org/news/2012/05/21/rural-associations-file-comments-on-level-3-call-signaling-waiver-petitions/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 May 2012 20:17:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>wta</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Filing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://w-t-a.org/news/?p=1372</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On May 14th, NECA, WTA, NTCA, and OPASTCO filed comments in response to a request for partial waiver of the FCC&#8217;s call signaling rules by Level 3.  The rural associations stated they &#8220;do not oppose grant of a waiver to Level 3 that is limited to circumstances identified in its petition, provided Level 3 provides [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On May 14th, NECA, WTA, NTCA, and OPASTCO <a href="http://w-t-a.org/news/wp-content/uploads/2012/05/0515level3comments.pdf">filed comments</a> in response to a request for partial waiver of the FCC&#8217;s call signaling rules by Level 3.  The rural associations stated they &#8220;do not oppose grant of a waiver to Level 3 that is limited to circumstances identified in its petition, provided Level 3 provides additional information regarding its use of pseudo-NANP numbers, a customer’s private numbering plan number, or a toll-free number to populate the CN, and provided that such waiver is subject to the same limitations and conditions as those the Associations recommended for prior waiver requests.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://w-t-a.org/news/2012/05/21/rural-associations-file-comments-on-level-3-call-signaling-waiver-petitions/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Rural Associations Discuss Call Completion Survey with FCC</title>
		<link>http://w-t-a.org/news/2012/05/21/rural-associations-discuss-call-completion-survey-with-fcc/</link>
		<comments>http://w-t-a.org/news/2012/05/21/rural-associations-discuss-call-completion-survey-with-fcc/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 May 2012 20:14:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>wta</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Filing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://w-t-a.org/news/?p=1368</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On May 17th, NECA, WTA, NTCA and OPASTCO met with representatives from the FCC&#8217;s Enforcement Bureau and Wireline Bureau to discuss the results of the Associations&#8217; recently completed call completion survey.  A notice of ex parte was filed.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On May 17th, NECA, WTA, NTCA and OPASTCO met with representatives from the FCC&#8217;s Enforcement Bureau and Wireline Bureau to discuss the <a href="http://w-t-a.org/news/wp-content/uploads/2012/05/April-2012-Test-Call-Reports-final-REDACTED_EXPARTE-Att-3-5-21-12.pdf">results</a> of the Associations&#8217; recently completed call completion survey.  A <a href="http://w-t-a.org/news/wp-content/uploads/2012/05/call-completion-ex-parte-cover-5-21-12.pdf">notice of </a><em><a href="http://w-t-a.org/news/wp-content/uploads/2012/05/call-completion-ex-parte-cover-5-21-12.pdf">ex parte</a> </em>was filed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://w-t-a.org/news/2012/05/21/rural-associations-discuss-call-completion-survey-with-fcc/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Rural Associations File Comments on ARC and Fairpoint Call Signaling Waiver Petitions</title>
		<link>http://w-t-a.org/news/2012/05/04/rural-associations-file-comments-on-arc-and-fairpoint-call-signaling-waiver-petitions/</link>
		<comments>http://w-t-a.org/news/2012/05/04/rural-associations-file-comments-on-arc-and-fairpoint-call-signaling-waiver-petitions/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 May 2012 18:55:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>wta</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Filing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://w-t-a.org/news/?p=1360</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Today, NECA, WTA, NTCA and OPASTCO filed comments on two petitions requesting waiver of the FCC&#8217;s call signaling rules.  The Alaska Rural Companies requested a broad waiver of the rules, and, in their comments, the rural associations &#8220;do not oppose grant of the requested waiver for the four specified circumstances described in the petition, subject [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Today, NECA, WTA, NTCA and OPASTCO filed comments on two petitions requesting waiver of the FCC&#8217;s call signaling rules.  The Alaska Rural Companies requested a broad waiver of the rules, and, in <a href="http://w-t-a.org/news/wp-content/uploads/2012/05/5412-arc-signalcomments.pdf">their comments</a>, the rural associations &#8220;do not oppose grant of the requested waiver for the four specified circumstances described in the petition, subject to certain conditions as described herein.&#8221;</p>
<p>In the second petition, Fairpoint Communications requests a waiver &#8220;with respect to certain1SS7 network elements and multifrequency signaling equipment.&#8221;  In <a href="http://w-t-a.org/news/wp-content/uploads/2012/05/5412-fairpoint-signalcomments.pdf">their comments</a>, the rural associations &#8220;do not oppose grant of a waiver to FairPoint that is limited to circumstances identified in its petition.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://w-t-a.org/news/2012/05/04/rural-associations-file-comments-on-arc-and-fairpoint-call-signaling-waiver-petitions/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Rural Associations File Comments on ACS Call Signaling Waiver Petition</title>
		<link>http://w-t-a.org/news/2012/04/23/rural-associations-file-comments-on-acs-call-signaling-waiver-petition/</link>
		<comments>http://w-t-a.org/news/2012/04/23/rural-associations-file-comments-on-acs-call-signaling-waiver-petition/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Apr 2012 20:25:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>wta</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Filing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://w-t-a.org/news/?p=1341</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Today, WTA, NECA, NTCA and OPASTCO filed comments in a proceeding regarding the petition for waiver by the Alaska Communications Systems Group of the FCC’s newly-adopted call signaling rules with respect to certain SS7 network elements, multi-frequency signaling equipment, and IP traffic exchanges.  The rural associations &#8220;do not oppose grant of a waiver to ACS [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Today, WTA, NECA, NTCA and OPASTCO <a href="http://w-t-a.org/news/wp-content/uploads/2012/04/filing.callsignaling.acs_.associations.final_.042312.pdf">filed comments</a> in a proceeding regarding the petition for waiver by the Alaska Communications Systems Group of the FCC’s newly-adopted call signaling rules with respect to certain SS7 network elements, multi-frequency signaling equipment, and IP traffic exchanges.  The rural associations &#8220;do not oppose grant of a waiver to ACS that is limited to circumstances identified in similar petitions filed by AT&amp;T, CenturyLink, and Hawaiian Telcom, provided that such waiver is subject to the same limitations and conditions as those the Associations recommended&#8230;&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://w-t-a.org/news/2012/04/23/rural-associations-file-comments-on-acs-call-signaling-waiver-petition/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Rural Associations File Separations Freeze Reply Comments</title>
		<link>http://w-t-a.org/news/2012/04/12/rural-associations-file-reply-separations-freeze-reply-comments/</link>
		<comments>http://w-t-a.org/news/2012/04/12/rural-associations-file-reply-separations-freeze-reply-comments/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Apr 2012 19:25:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>wta</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Filing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://w-t-a.org/news/?p=1336</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Today, WTA, NECA, NTCA, OPASTCO, ITTA and ERTA filed reply comments noting that &#8220;the exception of the National Association of State Utility Consumer Advocates (NASUCA) and Sprint, all parties endorse the Commission’s proposal to extend the freeze2 as it continues to implement changes to its intercarrier compensation (ICC) and Universal Service Fund (USF).&#8221;]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Today, WTA, NECA, NTCA, OPASTCO, ITTA and ERTA <a href="http://w-t-a.org/news/wp-content/uploads/2012/04/4.12.12separationsreply.pdf">filed reply comments</a> noting that &#8220;the exception of the National Association of State Utility Consumer Advocates (NASUCA) and Sprint, all parties endorse the Commission’s proposal to extend the freeze2 as it continues to implement changes to its intercarrier compensation (ICC) and Universal Service Fund (USF).&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://w-t-a.org/news/2012/04/12/rural-associations-file-reply-separations-freeze-reply-comments/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Rural Associations File Comments on Hawaiian Telcom Waiver Petition</title>
		<link>http://w-t-a.org/news/2012/04/09/rural-associations-file-comments-on-hawaiian-telephone-waiver-petition/</link>
		<comments>http://w-t-a.org/news/2012/04/09/rural-associations-file-comments-on-hawaiian-telephone-waiver-petition/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Apr 2012 19:42:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>wta</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Filing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://w-t-a.org/news/?p=1329</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Today, WTA, NECA, NCTA and OPASTCO filed comments with the FCC stating that they &#8220;do not oppose grant of the requested waiver for the two specified circumstances described in the petition, subject to certain conditions as described herein.&#8221;  Hawaiian Telcom had requested a waiver of newly adopted call signaling rules in two specific instances.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Today, WTA, NECA, NCTA and OPASTCO <a href="http://w-t-a.org/news/wp-content/uploads/2012/04/4912hitelecomsignal-final.pdf">filed comments</a> with the FCC stating that they &#8220;do not oppose grant of the requested waiver for the two specified circumstances described in the petition, subject to certain conditions as described herein.&#8221;  Hawaiian Telcom had requested a waiver of newly adopted call signaling rules in two specific instances.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://w-t-a.org/news/2012/04/09/rural-associations-file-comments-on-hawaiian-telephone-waiver-petition/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Rural Associations Support Separations Freeze</title>
		<link>http://w-t-a.org/news/2012/04/05/rural-associations-support-separations-freeze/</link>
		<comments>http://w-t-a.org/news/2012/04/05/rural-associations-support-separations-freeze/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Apr 2012 19:09:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>wta</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Filing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://w-t-a.org/news/?p=1321</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Today, NECA, WTA, NTCA, OPASTCO, ITTA, and ERTA filed comments with the FCC supporting a two year extension of the current freeze of Part 36 category relationships and jurisdictional cost allocation factors.  The associations wrote that &#8220;This two-year period should provide adequate time for the Joint Board and interested parties to determine how existing separations [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Today, NECA, WTA, NTCA, OPASTCO, ITTA, and ERTA <a href="http://w-t-a.org/news/wp-content/uploads/2012/04/4.05.12-separations-freeze.pdf">filed comments</a> with the FCC supporting a two year extension of the current freeze of Part 36 category relationships and jurisdictional cost allocation factors.  The associations wrote that &#8220;This two-year period should provide adequate time for the Joint Board and interested parties to determine how existing separations rules should be conformed to the new ICC and USF/Connect America Fund (CAF) rules.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://w-t-a.org/news/2012/04/05/rural-associations-support-separations-freeze/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>WTA, Wheat State Telephone and Madison Telephone meet with FCC</title>
		<link>http://w-t-a.org/news/2012/04/05/wta-wheat-state-telephone-and-madison-telephone-meet-with-fcc/</link>
		<comments>http://w-t-a.org/news/2012/04/05/wta-wheat-state-telephone-and-madison-telephone-meet-with-fcc/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Apr 2012 13:22:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>wta</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Filing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://w-t-a.org/news/?p=1318</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On March 29th, representatives from WTA, Wheat State Telephone (KS) and Madison Telephone (KS) met with FCC officials from the Wireline Competition Bureau as well as staff from the offices of Commissioners McDowell and Clyburn.  A notice of ex parte was filed.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On March 29th, representatives from WTA, Wheat State Telephone (KS) and Madison Telephone (KS) met with FCC officials from the Wireline Competition Bureau as well as staff from the offices of Commissioners McDowell and Clyburn.  A <a href="http://w-t-a.org/news/wp-content/uploads/2012/04/WTAExparteKansasMar2012WCB.pdf">notice of ex parte</a> was filed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://w-t-a.org/news/2012/04/05/wta-wheat-state-telephone-and-madison-telephone-meet-with-fcc/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Rural Associations File Comments on GCI Waiver Request</title>
		<link>http://w-t-a.org/news/2012/04/02/rural-associations-file-comments-on-gci-waiver-request/</link>
		<comments>http://w-t-a.org/news/2012/04/02/rural-associations-file-comments-on-gci-waiver-request/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Apr 2012 20:17:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>wta</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Filing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://w-t-a.org/news/?p=1315</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Today, WTA, NECA, NTCA and OPASCTO filed comments on a petition by GCI request for a limited waiver of the FCC’s call signaling rules.  The associations do not oppose granting &#8220;the requested waiver for the four specified circumstances described in the petition, subject to certain conditions as described herein. The associations oppose, however, GCI’s request for [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Today, WTA, NECA, NTCA and OPASCTO <a href="http://w-t-a.org/news/wp-content/uploads/2012/04/040212gcisignalpetitioncomments.pdf">filed comments</a> on a petition by GCI request for a limited waiver of the FCC’s call signaling rules.  The associations do not oppose granting &#8220;the requested waiver for the four specified circumstances described in the petition, subject to certain conditions as described herein. The associations oppose, however, GCI’s request for a broader waiver as unreasonably vague.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://w-t-a.org/news/2012/04/02/rural-associations-file-comments-on-gci-waiver-request/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Rural Associations File Reply Comments on ICC Portions of FNPRM</title>
		<link>http://w-t-a.org/news/2012/03/30/rural-associations-file-reply-comments-on-icc-portions-of-fnprm/</link>
		<comments>http://w-t-a.org/news/2012/03/30/rural-associations-file-reply-comments-on-icc-portions-of-fnprm/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Mar 2012 18:20:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>wta</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Filing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://w-t-a.org/news/?p=1310</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Today, NECA, WTA, NTCA and OPASTCO filed reply comments on the intercarrier compensation portions of the Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Today, NECA, WTA, NTCA and OPASTCO filed <a href="http://w-t-a.org/news/wp-content/uploads/2012/03/WC-10-90-RuralAssoc_ICC-REPLY-CMTS_XVII-L-R_03.30.12.pdf">reply comments</a> on the intercarrier compensation portions of the Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://w-t-a.org/news/2012/03/30/rural-associations-file-reply-comments-on-icc-portions-of-fnprm/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

